13 lines
1.5 KiB
HTML
13 lines
1.5 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
|
<html>
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>Online text</title>
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8">
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<p dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;"></p><ol><li><strong><span lang="EN-US">Give an example how a phenomenon (for example
|
|
software quality) can be studied quantitatively.</span></strong></li></ol><div><div><p dir="auto">Studying a topic quantitatively means collecting and analyzing data in a numerical or statistical manner. For software quality, the frequency of software crashes could be recorded and studied to measure software quality using a quantitative approach.</p></div><div><p dir="auto"><em>No AI tools were used in this answer.</em></p></div><br></div><ol><li><strong><span lang="EN-US">Compare interviews and questionnaires as data collection methods. What are their strengths and weaknesses in
|
|
scientific research?</span></strong></li></ol><div><div><p dir="auto">Interviews are more in-depth and flexible, as they can contain open-ended questions or non-verbal cues, leading to richer data. However, they are also more time-consuming and can be influenced by the interviewer's biases.</p></div><div><p dir="auto">Questionnaires, on the other hand, are more standardized and can reach a larger number of participants. However, may not provide as much depth or nuance, and can be misinterpreted by respondents, leading to insufficient or inaccurate data.</p></div><div><p dir="auto"><em>No AI tools were used in this answer.</em></p></div><br></div><p></p>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html> |