11 lines
1.8 KiB
HTML
11 lines
1.8 KiB
HTML
<!doctype html>
|
|
<html>
|
|
<head>
|
|
<title>Online text</title>
|
|
<meta charset="utf-8">
|
|
|
|
</head>
|
|
<body>
|
|
<p dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;"></p><ol><ol><li><strong>Give an example of what could weak and strong mode of research be in software engineering</strong></li></ol></ol><div><div><p dir="auto">According to Newell (1969), strong methods are those designed to address a specific type of problem, while weak methods are general approaches that may be applied to many types of problems. Based on this definition, in software engineering, a weak mode of research could be a survey on developers' preferences for programming languages, while a strong mode of research could be investigating the impact of different programming paradigms on software maintainability.</p></div><div><p dir="auto">Newell. A., Heuristic programming: Ill-structured problems, in J. Aronofsky, ed., <em>Progress in Operations Research</em>, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1969.</p></div><div><p dir="auto"><em>No AI tools were used in this answer.</em></p></div></div><ol><ol><li><strong>What is the difference between action and design research?</strong></li></ol></ol><span><div><p dir="auto">Action research is a collaborative, iterative approach aimed at solving real-world problems in specific settings, like organizations or communities, by involving participants in both the research and implementation process. In contrast, design research focuses on creating and testing artifacts, such as products or systems, to solve specific problems or improve user experiences, with an emphasis on learning through the design process and refining solutions over time.</p></div></span><span><div><p dir="auto"><em>ChatGPT was used to rewrite this answer to make it better.</em></p></div></span><strong><br></strong><p></p>
|
|
</body>
|
|
</html> |